The Impact of Minimum Lot Size Requirements on Massachusetts Housing Prices
- Jonathan Berk
- 1 minute ago
- 2 min read

One of the biggest, least-discussed reasons housing is so expensive in Massachusetts comes down to something simple: minimum lot size rules. These rules were put in place at a time in the 1960s and 1970s when they were meant to slow the pace of growth but, nearly 50-years later, we've entered a phase were net new housing production is now nearly frozen in Most Greater Boston communities.

Since the 1970s, it's been reported that minimum lot sizes were one of the greatest threats to our housing future here in Massachusetts but little if anything has been done about it since. In a Boston Globe article published in 1977 on the impacts of zoning more broadly. "a three bedroom house in the Boston area that should cost in the vicinity of $30,000 ends up costing almost $50,000 because of town regulations. Approximately $4000 (8% of the total cost) of the difference, according to a Home Builders report, results from the house being built on a two-acre lot instead of a half-acre lot."
Across Greater Boston’s 187 cities and towns:
• 95 zone at least half their land for homes on 1-acre lots (40,000 sq. ft.) or larger.
• 27 communities zone 90%+ of their land that way.
• 14 reserve 90%+ of their land for 2-acre lots or more.
That means in many places, it’s literally illegal to build modest homes on modest lots, the kind of homes that once built our middle class and those that make up the vast majority of our housing supply today.
And the impact is real:
When the average lot size goes up by just a quarter acre in Greater Boston, housing production overall drops by about 10% (2006 numbers).
According to a 2006 study from the Harvard Kennedy School, adding a single acre to the minimum lot size drives up local home prices by:
• +15.7% in 1987
• +11.3% in 1995
• +19.5% in 2001
These rules were written decades ago, often to “protect neighborhood character.” But today, they’re protecting scarcity... locking out new neighbors, driving up costs, and limiting opportunity for young families, essential workers, and seniors.
"Legalize Starter Homes" Ballot Initiative
As of this week, it looks like Massachusetts voters may have the opportunity to vote on a change to Massachusetts' minimum lot size requirements by limiting the size lot a municipality can require to build a home, anywhere with water and sewer access, to 5,000sf. A monumental change for some communities very close to Boston where minimum lot sizes today routinely reach 60,000 - 80,000sf. We'll find out in the coming weeks whether or not the Legalize Starter Homes initiative was able to achieve the 74,000 certified signatures required to make the ballot in November 2026.
If we want a future where our kids can live near where they grew up, where families can afford opportunities for home ownership once far more commonplace, and where Massachusetts economy can continue to grow, we need to take a hard look at just how our current minimum lot size requirements hamper this region's future.